Círculo de palabra
8 Imox
Creator or created?
Which one is it? Let's look at both. One idea says everything is the creator, the creator chooses what happens, what occurs, a single mind we imagine decides in the randomness of infinite possibilities that mathematically life gives, the cosmos, time, the present, this planet. It certainly looks like someone's creating it, so many rare occurrences, coincidences, stories full of irony happen as if god or some guy murphy had thought of it; we're reading its bestseller!
The other idea says we experience a created, by a creator or by a big bang (sounds hot), but it's just matter playing it's thing and we can come so close to understanding it we prognosticate it correctly. Or so we think. Explanationist science can take us away looking at it and fetching a future with it, but not the best future I would say, not a future even, arguably.
The real thing is, we don't know what's real, nor where we are going. Real is the fact that we've been fed a whole bunch of stories that are hell of good stories, but stories they are, and story is all there is. We're trying to find a solid where the whole thing has gone liquid. Yet they are both, so no single explanation is ever full, and no story we tell is close to the full story, the reality we live.
Imox is different than B'aatz. It demands respect since it thinks that it may be a story, but it's our story and we're playing it sincerely; and that's all we've got: this life. Playing around is cool but something must go on the serious side. A whole lot more happens here that you would think. Then, finding the explanation is not such a bad quest. It's being able to tell the story. It might not be quite, but you're saying it, and they're hearing you.